Oil Prices Jump
"With Oil Prices Poised to Jump as Much as 70%, Every Investor Needs an Energy
The U.S. news media has convinced many investors that oil consumption is falling
because of the global recession. While that may be true, it's a disservice to millions of investors because oil
production is declining at a pace that's actually three times faster.
And that suggests higher oil and gasoline prices in coming months - perhaps as much as
50% - 70% higher, or more - particularly if a U.S. economic recovery is truly in the offing.
To really see what I'm talking about, let's start with a close look at consumption.
I'm asked about this frequently in my global wanderings, most recently at the Las Vegas Money Show last
For months we've been hearing about a drop in global demand. It's a popular story and
one that sounds credible: After all, it seems logical to assume that during economic chaos, consumers and
businesses alike will rethink their budgets and ratchet back their spending.
For consumers, the continued economic malaise will mean fewer trips to the store,
less-ambitious vacations, and car-pooling to school or work. For businesses, the cutbacks by consumers will clearly
translate into canceling trips where conference calls will suffice and using lower-cost shipping alternatives for
the decreased sales volumes most U.S. companies will experience.
According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, oil consumption fell by
nearly 50,000 barrels a day throughout 2008. According to the latest figures, the EIA suggests that global oil
demand may slump to 83.4 million barrels a day in 2009 - nearly 2.4 million barrels below 2008 consumption levels.
On a percentage basis, that's almost a 3% drop. I have my doubts that we'll actually see a decline of this
magnitude, but if it does occur, it will be the first time ever that consumption has declined for two straight
years. That alone is pretty noteworthy in this era of cohesive and powerful global growth.
Emerging markets oil consumption growth
The reason I have my doubts about such a steep decline in demand is this: While
overall consumption is dropping in such developed economies as the United States, Europe and Australia, it's being
at least partially offset by continued growth in China, the Middle East and Latin America. Because the data
produced there is less than transparent, I can't help but think that analysts are underestimating the growth we'll
be seeing in those markets, where consumption is accelerating strongly. And it's entirely possible that growth in
those markets will outstrip any fall here in the developed world.
Even if the growth in the emerging markets doesn't quite offset the decline in their
developed brethren, analysts seem to be forgetting that oil prices are a function of two variables - consumption
and production. And it's the change in production that's going to catch a lot of people by surprise.
After a run of record high oil prices punctuated by frantic resources development,
we're now seeing the opposite scenario. The long period of lower than anticipated oil prices following oil's
meteoric rise last year means that the entire industry is no longer making the investments needed to sustain
production capacity or actual production.
And not many folks recognize this fact.
Oil production has been declining
For instance, direct project investment in drilling may be down as much as 20%,
while the number of drill rigs in operation in America alone has dropped by more than 40%. Various estimates from
the EIA and private sources suggest that actual U.S. production may fall by as much as 320,000 barrels a day. While
the amount is a matter of debate, the fact that production is declining is not.
More than 20% of total U.S. oil production comes from tiny wells located in remote
areas that were marginally profitable producers when crude oil was trading at $100 a barrel. With oil currently at
about $61 a barrel, those producers are practically worthless now. So the "mom-and-pop" shops that own them are
actually abandoning entire fields and equipment without a moment's thought.
To be fair, at least part of the drop in demand can be attributed to increased
reliance on methanol, ethanol and other types of biofuel, but that's hard to quantify at the moment because the
long period of low oil prices has eroded the economic viability of alternative fuels - at least for now.
The story is much the same with new exploration projects being cancelled left, right
and center. The trend is particularly apparent in the Canadian oil sands that were everybody's fancy only 24
months ago. Now we're seeing Royal Dutch Shell PLC (NYSE ADR: RDS.A, RDS.B), StatoilHydro ASA (NYSE ADR: STO) and
Petro-Canada USA (NYSE: PCZ) each backing away from multi-million dollar investments that were to bring online an
estimated 500,000 barrels a day.
Russian, Saudi and Mexican producers are reporting the biggest production drops seen
in 50 years. Even Venezuelan leader President Hugo Chavez - the perennial motor mouth and longtime U.S. critic - is
eating crow. He's begrudgingly invited (read that to mean "is begging") the oil companies whose assets he
nationalized only a year ago to "come back" into the market.
He has no choice. Venezuela's oil production is already below its 1997 levels, and
many analysts say that output could fall even more since Chavez has done such a thorough job of alienating the big
foreign oil companies that actually possess the technology needed to extract crude oil from that country's
Chavez's Chavez’s government seized the assets of 60 foreign and domestic oil service
companies after conflict erupted over nearly $14 billion in debt owed by the country's state-owned energy company,
Petroleos de Venezuela (PDVSA). PDVSA accumulated the debt as oil prices took a dramatic slide from over $147 a
barrel last July to less than $35 a barrel in February.
Then there's simple shrinkage. This is an oil industry term for declining output. The
EIA recently released data suggesting that production at more than 800 oil fields around the world is going to
decline by about 9.1%. It doesn't matter whether the decline is prompted by depletion, war, or simple neglect. The
fact is that this shrinkage will take an estimated 7.6 million barrels per day out of the system.
I could go on but I think you get the picture.
Now imagine what could happen to oil-and-gasoline prices when normalized demand
resumes. Not only will there be less oil in storage, but virtually the entire industry - exploration, production,
refining and sales - is going to be caught sitting on its heels when the world needs it to be zooming along in high
gear. And that means the companies that make up this industry will have to ramp up again to meet the newly
increased consumption demands.
This whole process could take two years - or even longer - to play out.
As for prices, history is replete with examples of what happens when there are major
shortages of key commodities.
In the Energy Crisis of 1973-74, for example, I can still remember the numbingly long
gas lines and waiting in the car for hours to get a fill-up. My father and grandfather vividly remember that prices
quadrupled in a matter of months. I'm sure you do, too.
Only a few years later, in 1979, we got another oil shock when prices quadrupled
again. Because it was coupled with stagnant economic growth and virulent inflation (stagflation), this period was
an economic disaster for the United States.
For those who had learned from the earlier crisis, however, it was a mondo profit
High oil prices contributed to the current financial
The same can be said for 2007-2008, when the huge spike in oil prices that I
predicted contributed to the bear market in stocks, tight credit and recessionary conditions that led to the
current malaise that continues to grip the U.S. economy. As much as anything else, high oil prices contributed to
the carnage we've seen in the auto-making and airline industries, and to the financial crisis that started here
before spanning the globe. Which brings us full circle.
Many investors will refuse to believe we've arrived at this new energy nexus,
especially given all the hype we've seen surrounding alternative fuels, hybrid vehicles and the new "green"
mentality that's taken hold here in this country. If you listen to some of the real believers, they'll tell you
that we could be living in a petroleum-free Nirvana - as early as tomorrow.
While I personally would like that, too, it's a misleading argument if for no other
reason than there are millions of consumer items we use - from plastic bags to makeup - still created using
petroleum. And there are still more than 60,000 manufacturing processes that depend on petroleum, and even the most
aggressive estimates suggest that it will take the world decades to shift away from them.
We're in much the same situation when it comes to hybrid vehicles. There isn't a
mass-produced electric vehicle available today that could offset the coming rise in recovery-driven demand for oil
and gasoline. There's a strong effort underway, but I'm not aware of a single company ready to field the solution
in cost-affordable quantities by 2010 - which is when most analysts say a recovering economy will stoke demand for
Of course, U.S. President Barack Obama's much-lauded efficiency and
greenhouse-gas-standards mandate will help significantly, but that's like bolting the barn door after the horses
have run for the fields. The irony of watching auto executives "applaud" his press conference was almost too much
to watch with a straight face. But that's a story for another time.
The bottom line is this: Our society will be highly dependent on oil for many years to
come and investors should plan accordingly.
If governments around the world really want to get serious, they could collectively
work to eliminate the fuel subsidies that are part of the price paid for gasoline in Asia or sugarcane ethanol in
Brazil. We could also stop our own energy pork barreling. But given the complete lack of transparency that
surrounds this issue - not to mention the influence wielded by vested industry interests, and the scores of
well-paid lobbyists that patrol the halls of power in our nation's capital - I don't think we'll see any big
changes anytime soon.
So I'm left with one inescapable conclusion, at least in the intermediate term. Every
investor needs to have at least some sort of energy strategy - preferably one that includes a range of drillers,
producers and suppliers to cover the spectrum from wellhead to consumer.
That way, we can profit from an increase in energy prices that we can only hope rise
fast enough to jump-start the oil industry's production arm but not so fast that it snuffs out the badly needed